Bronica GS-1 6x7cm SLR
Related Local Links:
Bronica ETR pages
GS-1 Pros and Cons
GS-1 Review (by Danny Gonzalez)
GS-1 MLU Update (by Danny Gonzalez)
GS-1 Tests of Lens Resolution
Rumors of Bronica SQ/GS Production to End?
The Bronica GS-1 is a 6x7cm SLR distributed by Tamron/Bronica. The GS-1 is
a relatively compact SLR compared to its chief competitors, the Mamiya
RB/RZ67 series. The GS-1 is an ideal field and travel camera, being not
much bigger or heavier than many 6x6cm systems, yet providing an "ideal
format" 6x7cm negative.
The "ideal format" concept is simply that you can
crop in the camera, and enlarge directly to standard printing paper sizes
with minimal cropping or loss of negative area. Hence, the 6x7cm format
offers a circa 25% increase in usable negative area over a cropped 6x6cm
or standard 6x4.5cm negative. West Coast Imaging (see MF FAQ) suggests that 6x6cm enlarges well up to
16x20", while a 6x7cm negative supports up to 20x24" enlargements.
In fairness to the Mamiya 6x7cm SLRs, they have rotating backs and bellows
leaf shutter lens mounts which makes them very handy in the studio and for
closeup work. The other major 6x7cm SLR is the focal plane shutter Pentax
6x7cm SLR models. The Pentax 6x7cm has a number of nice longer telephoto
lenses, among other optics, which are relatively modest cost in part due
to the lack of a leaf shutter in each lens.
So why doesn't the Bronica GS-1 get more respect? If you wanted a low cost
6x7cm SLR, the Pentax 6x7cm SLR models have more lens choices, at lower
prices partly due to the lack of leaf shutter lenses in each model. If you
prefer leaf shutter lenses, the Mamiya RB/RZ67 6x7cm SLR series have a
more diverse line of lenses, including fisheyes and ultrawides as well as
soft focus and APO telephotos. While the Mamiya RB/RZ have a built-in
(non-tilting) bellows for closeups, the GS-1 only has one pricey auto
extension tube ($500 US) and a bellows (circa $1,800 USD).
The table of GS-1 lenses below shows the somewhat limited nature of GS-1
lenses, especially in the wide angle and specialty lens range (e.g.,
soft-focus, long telephotos). A few of the lenses are a third to a full
stop slower than competitor's lenses of similar focal lengths (mainly
telephotos).
LENSES for BRONICA GS-1: f/l (mm) f/stop $US (B&H) 50mm 4.5 $1,700 65mm 4 $1,515 80mm 3.5 $1,348 100mm 3.5 $1,150 110mm 4 $1,700 macro 150mm 4 $1,515 200mm 4.5 $1,595 250mm 5.6 $1,700 500mm 8 $11,220 1.4X $900 2X $935
Careful shopping on EBAY and online
dealers and photo-net will turn up
many relative bargains in Bronica GS-1 lenses, bodies, prisms, and
accessories, often at half or less the street price. The flip side of that
observation is that if you are buying new GS-1 gear, be sure the camera is
what you want and meets your needs by renting or trying out extensively
first! Otherwise, you may be one of those taking a major loss on GS-1 gear
by selling it into a depressed market.
To my mind, the big advantages of the Bronica GS-1 is its relatively
compact size and easy handling coupled with professional quality leaf
shutter lenses and advanced electronics (autoexposure and TTL auto-flash
but not autofocus). Can you live with the limited lens line, lack of
rotating back, and limited close-focusing of the lenses and macro
capabilities? If yes, then you may find the Bronica GS-1 to be the best
current 6x7cm SLR for field and traveling use. If you just need or want a
two or three lens 6x7cm camera kit, you may be able to build up a GS-1 kit
at a surprisingly modest cost on the used market.
References: See August 8, 2001 Brit. Jrnl of Photography, p. 12-3 review.
GS-1 Body - Front View
GS-1 Body - Side View
[note: black body = mk I; silver = mk II]
Photos Courtesy of Kelvin Lee - [email protected]
[Ed. note: Special Thanks to Kelvin Lee for supplying these GS-1
Photos!!!]
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001
From: kelvin [email protected]
To: Robert Monaghan [email protected]
Subject: GS1 photos
Hi Bob
Here are the Gs photos promised from some time back. They're not the
best... I'm still trying to learn how to use this digital cam.
Let me know if usable or should I take some new ones.
...
Bronica GS-1 Lens Tests | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
100mm | contrast | contrast | ||
f/stops | lpm-center | lpm-edge | center | edge |
3.5 | 29 | 29 | 59 | 23 |
4 | 32 | 32 | 58 | 33 |
5.6 | 36 | 32 | 60 | 42 |
8 | 41 | 36 | 76 | 43 |
11 | 45 | 41 | 68 | 39 |
16 | 45 | 41 | 60 | 30 |
22 | 41 | 36 | 50 | 29 |
65mm | contrast | contrast | ||
f/stops | lpm-center | lpm-edge | center | edge |
4 | 40 | 36 | 70 | 29 |
5.6 | 50 | 36 | 71 | 30 |
8 | 63 | 40 | 74 | 34 |
11 | 57 | 40 | 71 | 31 |
16 | 50 | 40 | 65 | 28 |
22 | 45 | 36 | 48 | 27 |
contrast | contrast | |||
150mm | lpm-center | lpm-edge | center | edge |
4 | 32 | 32 | 58 | 29 |
5.6 | 36 | 32 | 65 | 36 |
8 | 45 | 36 | 66 | 39 |
11 | 40 | 36 | 64 | 38 |
16 | 40 | 36 | 62 | 28 |
22 | 40 | 32 | 47 | 27 |
The above lens tests may be of interest, though you should refer to the main article
for fuller details and related Modern Photography tests for comparative data.
Note that this test also relates the contrast percentages (center/edge) as well as
lpmm resolution (center and edge). Contrast interpretation varys with lens type, with
the 150mm f/4 lens scores all being "hi" on contrast, the 65mm f/4 lens center contrast
values also all rating a "hi" grade as did the center contrast values for the 100mm f/3.5.
Keep in mind that these lenses cover 6x7cm, or 25% more than 6x6cm, so slightly lower
scores than typical 6x6cm lenses is still very respectable performance. The 100mm lens
had 1.5% barrel distortion and lost 1.2 stops in the edges. The 65mm lens had 0.6% barrel
distortion and lost 1.25 stops. The camera with Waist level finder and back plus batteries
weighs a hefty 2 lbs, 13 3/4 oz. (1298 gms). The 100mm lens adds 1 lb. 5 13/16 oz. or 620 gms
to that total, making the camera over 4 lbs total! The GS-1 is moderately loud, at 85 dB at 1/125th second
shutter noise levels.
My opinions (not necessarily shared by others):
>Any comments anyone?
A fine camera and system especially for field work, or combo field/studio
work. System is easy to use, pieces and parts work together as a
well-thought-out whole. Excellent lenses, all leaf shutter, so fill flash
sychronizes at all shutter speeds. Big and heavy, but no more so than
Pentax 67, and much smaller/lighter than RB/RZ. New prices are high, but
not so bad used.
>Why is the GS1 less popular than the Mamiya RB/RZ system?
1. Smaller system (i.e., fewer lenses and accessories).
2. Little promoted by its distributor (Tamron).
3. Heavy promotion by Mamiya of their 6x7 products.
4. Lack of rotating back in the GS-1 makes RB/RZ a more desirable studio
camera.
5. RB has been around longer.
> How difficult is it to hand-hold the GS1?
Not difficult at all if you have the excellent speed grip. Much more
comfortable to hold than RB/RZ, IMO.
From: "Rick Rieger" [email protected]
Newsgroups: rec.photo.equipment.medium-format
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001
Subject: Re: bronica GS-1 feedback
Hi, Frank,
I have two GS-1 bodies, five lenses, both AE finders and other items such
as extension tubes and teleconverters. Except for one back, all was
purchased used, mostly from Midwest Photo. It's been a great system and
has given me outstanding results. It's an easy system to use, and
although heavy, is not too bad to lug around. I use my system mostly in
the field, but do some portraits and group shots as well. As for lenses,
the 100mm is a dream...as sharp as anything I've seen in medium format.
It's great for group portraits and ok for head and shoulder shots. The
150 or 200 would be better for the tighter shots. As for wide angle, the
65 is a good all around choice and still uses 72mm filters. The 50 is
good, too, but a little softer wide open at the edges and it takes 95mm
(ouch!) filters. A good three lens outfit would be the 65, 100, and 200.
I don't personally have much use for the 80 (rare), 250 (big), or 500
(ridiculous $$$). The 1.4x extender is good, the 2x is not. IMO.
The GS-1 is a heavy outfit for weddings. I don't shoot weddings, so I
can't really comment with any authority, but a 6x6 or 645 system would
probably be a better choice for wedding work.
What to watch out for? Well, the lenses. After a number of years, the
lens shutter actuating pin can become stiff, and this is exacerbated by
cold weather. I had three of my lenses quit on me in 30 degree F weather.
The camera couldn't move the lens pin and the system locked up. Tamron
fixed the lenses quickly and they're like new now, but at a cost of $190
per lens.
I have a post on Robert Monaghan's web site that discusses how to check
for this. It's an easy process that requires no tools or disassembly and
can be done in less than a minute. Buy lenses that have a freely moving
pin, and you won't need service for a long time. Check
http://www.smu.edu/~rmonagha/mf/
Good luck.
Rick Rieger
"Frank Earl" [email protected] wrote
> After looking at the medium format pages and doing some web research, I > think that I would like to go with a Bronica GS-1 as a medium format camera. > Would GS-1 users be kind enough to let me know a few of the things to look > for? Any recurring problems with camera bodies, backs, finders, flash, & > lenses? Which options would you recommend? I would be using the camera > primarily in the field, but I occasionally have to do wedding and > portraiture for relatives (which I enjoy). I keep my lighting very simple, > using natural light with reflective fill light for portraiture and one flash > off camera for weddings if necessary. Does the standard lens work for > groups and head and shoulder portraits? Should I plan on a second lens - a > wide-angle? As I will be buying used, I would appreciate any information you > could give me. Thanks.
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001
Newsgroups: rec.photo.equipment.medium-format
From: "PDXTWINS" [email protected]
Subject: Re: Bronica GS1 bodies .. all the same technically?
The only changes I have seen are a few parts upgrades which is good.
Try contacting Tamron for specific info
Mike
www.mfcrepair.com
"Daniel A Robertson" [email protected] wrote
> Are all Bronica GS1 bodies much the same TECHNICALLY (I am not talking > cosmetics or S/H), or have there been significant tweaks by the > manufacturer over the many years they have made these? > > If it is the second, how do I distinguish between the bodies, and what > are the tweaks? I have checked out http://www.smu.edu/~rmonagha/mf > etc. for information already. A Bronica guru, please!
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001
From: "David" [email protected]
Newsgroups: rec.photo.equipment.medium-format
Subject: Re: bronica GS-1 feedback
Hi Frank,
Congratulations on your choice. The GS-1 is a great camera with
fantastic lenses, and without the Hasselblad price. (Although I still
lust for a Hasselblad). As a long time GS-1 user, here's a few lessons
I've learned:
Forget the wide angle lens. I had the 50mm lens and paid $1500 used and
never used it. I discovered that I am a portrait photographer, and never
did any landscape or any of the "creative" wide angle shots. However, if
you shoot weddings or do field work as you stated, you may like the wide
lens. The standard lens (100mm) is a good choice for group and head &
shoulder shots. However, I mostly use the 150mm for the latter. I use
the 100, 150, and 200mm lenses. Almost all my portrait photography is
with the 150mm lens.
I prefer the rotary prism finder. Especially since I mostly do
portraits of small children, this finder has really saved my neck.
Getting low with this finder is so easy. And coupled with the Bogen 3051
tripod and 3265 pan head, I can work very quickly to get the shot.
Forget the 120 back. As this is the 6x7 size in the medium format
category, you only get 10 shots per 120 roll. Better to go with the 220
back and get 20 shots per roll. I found with the 120 backs I was changing
rolls often, and at the most critical times. Also, invest in a second
back.
If you work outside and primarily with ambient light, you may be
shooting at fairly slow shutter speeds. If so, you may want to get the
Electro-magnet cable release. It'll guarantee you didn't shake the camera
during exposure. I love mine.
I wouldn't consider the Bronica Speed-Light Flash. It's much too
expensive, and you can get stronger pro flashes at cheaper prices. I
rarely use flash, but when I do, I use a Quantum Q Flash T2 with a GS-1
module to make it a true TTL dedicated flash for the GS-1.
Lastly, I know of no problems with any of the backs, lenses, finders,
bodies. The only gripe I have is that Tamron should offer a motorized
winder for the GS-1.
Hope this helps.
- David
"Frank Earl" [email protected] wrote
> After looking at the medium format pages and doing some web research, I > think that I would like to go with a Bronica GS-1 as a medium format camera. > Would GS-1 users be kind enough to let me know a few of the things to look > for? Any recurring problems with camera bodies, backs, finders, flash, & > lenses? Which options would you recommend? I would be using the camera > primarily in the field, but I occasionally have to do wedding and > portraiture for relatives (which I enjoy). I keep my lighting very simple, > using natural light with reflective fill light for portraiture and one flash > off camera for weddings if necessary. Does the standard lens work for > groups and head and shoulder portraits? Should I plan on a second lens - a > wide-angle? As I will be buying used, I would appreciate any information you > could give me. Thanks.
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001
From: John Sparks [email protected]
Newsgroups: rec.photo.equipment.medium-format
Subject: Re: bronica GS-1 feedback
Ladagency [email protected] wrote:
>Good to hear from other GS-1 users. Curious the preference for the 100 mm vs >the 110 macro. Also, the new 80 mm is supposed to outperform the old line of >Zenzanons.
I have both the 100 and 110 macro. I find the image quality to be
pretty much identical between the two (both are very sharp lenses). I
have seen some MTF charts that would suggest that the 110 Macro is much
sharper, but I can't see it in my photographs. I was running into the
close focus limit on the 100 often enough that the Macro made sense to
me. The other choice is extension tubes, but since Bronica doesn't make
a really short one, there is virtually no overlap between close focus
without the tube and longest focus with the tube. Makes them pretty
much impractical for gaining closer focus with moving subjects.
I also find having f/32 on the Macro more useful than having f/3.5
on the non-macro (even though I do a lot of selective focus work, the
difference between f/3.5 and f/4 just isn't that much). I'd definately
skip the 100 and go for the 110 if I were doing it again (resale on the
GS-1 100 is pretty bad so I haven't really tried to sell it, anyone want
one?).
The 110 is getting close to the 150 which makes it a bit hard to justify
both. The 150 with the 1.4X converter does make a nice closer focusing
lens than the 200. I really wish Bronica would make the 180mm lens from
the SQ and ETRS lines available for the GS-1. I also wish they made a
really mild extension tube.
John Sparks
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001
From: "Rick Rieger" [email protected]
Newsgroups: rec.photo.equipment.medium-format
Subject: Re: bronica GS-1 feedback
I have had good success with Nikon dual-element closeup diopters 5T and 6T
on the 100mm, 150mm and even the 200mm. I use step-down rings to go from
the 72mm (or 82mm) lens filter size to the 62mm size of the 5T/6T. I have
not noticed any vignetting on 6x7. Results are excellent.
Rick Rieger
"John Sparks" [email protected] wrote
> Ladagency [email protected] wrote: > >Good to hear from other GS-1 users. Curious the preference for the 100 mm vs > >the 110 macro. Also, the new 80 mm is supposed to outperform the old line of > >Zenzanons. > > I have both the 100 and 110 macro. I find the image quality to be > pretty much identical between the two (both are very sharp lenses). I > have seen some MTF charts that would suggest that the 110 Macro is much > sharper, but I can't see it in my photographs. I was running into the > close focus limit on the 100 often enough that the Macro made sense to > me. The other choice is extension tubes, but since Bronica doesn't make > a really short one, there is virtually no overlap between close focus > without the tube and longest focus with the tube. Makes them pretty > much impractical for gaining closer focus with moving subjects. > > I also find having f/32 on the Macro more useful than having f/3.5 > on the non-macro (even though I do a lot of selective focus work, the > difference between f/3.5 and f/4 just isn't that much). I'd definately > skip the 100 and go for the 110 if I were doing it again (resale on the > GS-1 100 is pretty bad so I haven't really tried to sell it, anyone want > one?). > > The 110 is getting close to the 150 which makes it a bit hard to justify > both. The 150 with the 1.4X converter does make a nice closer focusing > lens than the 200. I really wish Bronica would make the 180mm lens from > the SQ and ETRS lines available for the GS-1. I also wish they made a > really mild extension tube. > > John Sparks
From Bronica Mailing List:
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001
From: "Rick Rieger" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Re: GS-1 vs. others...
I have a pretty complete GS-1 system (2 bodies, 5 lenses, 3 finders, etc.).
Here is my $0.02:
1. Optical quality vs. Hasselblad - I've only seen a comparison of the PG
100 to the Zeiss 80 (don't know which model). Examination of the chromes
didn't reveal any meaningful differences. The other GS-1 lenses I have (50,
65, 150, 200) have given me excellent results. The 50 is slightly soft in
the corners wide open but that doesn't diminish its usefulness. Perhaps
it's due to the retrofocus design of this lens.
2. Fear of Tamron dropping the system: probably well-founded. I look at
it this way. Repair will probably continue at least 10 years after the line
is discontinued, and I now have all the pieces/parts that I think I'll ever
need. Therefore, I don't worry too much about it. As of today, of course,
the GS-1 is still in the Tamron catalog.
3. Digital back: I'm not aware of one, but then I haven't looked for one.
I don't much care about this, either. My plan is to buy a Nikon 8000ED
scanner or equivalent and continue shooting on film. This will give me very
high resolution image files when I need them.
4. As for the accessories you listed, I would look into the rotary prism
finder if you're going to be doing any studio work. The speed grip is a
must-have for hand-held shooting. It changes the handling of the camera
completely. It's great. The GS-1 flash is not much to write home about.
It is essentially a slightly souped up Vivitar 283. In a December 8, 1998
post, Henry Posner of B&H Photovideo said that the Bogen SCA 386 #5571 works
with the Metz line and the GS-1. This might be a better option. I use a
Nikon SB24 with my system. No TTL, but it works for me.
5. Good places to shop in my experience are Midwest Photo in Columbus, OH,
and KEH in Atlanta.
Rick Rieger
.....
From Bronica Mailing List:
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001
From: kelvin <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: GS-1 vs. others
I have a full GS-1 system.
The optics are pretty damn good.
It doesn't feel as robust as the hassleblad , but unless you need that
sort of ruggardness , it's not an issue.
I put together my GS-1 kit - 2 bodies, 4 lenses, AE-prism etc. , 3
filmbacks , polaroid back etc. etc. used, for what would otherwise
be one hassleblad standard kit with an extra lens .
From: [email protected] (Ladagency) Newsgroups: rec.photo.equipment.medium-format Date: 09 Sep 2001 Subject: Re: Which MF camera for portraits and weddings? I stepped up to a Bronica GS-1 for the 6x7 format in studio and location work. For weddings I bought a 220 6x6 back because flipping a large camera with all its accessories for 8 hours is not an insignificant mechanical and physical challenge. I also liked the fact that the GS-1 with a 120 back, waist level finder, and standard lens weighed about as much as a similarly configured Hassy. HOWEVER, If I did it all over again I would stick to the Mamiya C330. I still have the S model with the 105DS and 135, but for weddings would add a 65 and 55 mm plus one or two extra bodies. In fact, I may revert to this set up after all. WHY? 1) A C330 body costs as little as a MF SLR back. Slap a body on it and you save lens changing time. 2) The TLR has the focus and lens framing advantages of the SLR but is as quiet as a rangefinder. 3) The C330 switches easily from 120 to 220 film. 4) The lenses cost less than half that of MF SLR's and are half the size. ($filters$) 5) Sometimes I use a green filter for heavy makeup and blemish problems in B&W photography. You can't view through a green filter on an SLR; you can with a TLR. 6) I overcame the problem of soft and vignette filters by slotting a Mamiya box lens shade and making my own filters. 7) A C330 with lens and film and porrofinder weighs half that of a MF SLR. 8) No Stroboframe for the C330? Again, no problem. Go to Home Depot and pick up some 1 inch aluminum stock, some screws, and the appropriate tap/drill sets and twist yourself up a dandy Flash/Accessory frame. (Requires a drill and vise) Accessory Shoes for you radio slave and little stuffed Canary Bird so the kids smile at you and your scary 'rig' are already at your camera shop. Spray paint it Black and make a Custom Frame brand name sticker on your inkjet. Put your name as the brand name. Cooool. NO CACHE? Hey, Helmut Newton used a Rollieflex and Avedon danced around with a C220 a time or two. And who sees the C TLR series anymore? It is novel and just rack out that bellows and it is an impressive piece of machinery. Good luck and be happy with your choice because when you drag it all to the wedding, that is the gal you will have to dance with.
From: "Mike" [email protected] Newsgroups: rec.photo.equipment.medium-format Subject: Re: 120 film in 220 magazine Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 Not always but in some cases pulling thicker film with a paper back can place an added strain on the winding mechanism in the back. In the case of the GS-1 there is a small chance that 120 film could cause a problem with the clutch in the insert. Mike www.mfcrepair.com
From: [email protected] (Ladagency) Newsgroups: rec.photo.equipment.medium-format Date: 02 May 2002 Subject: Re: Bronica GS-1 or Mamiya 645 I found the GS-1 lenses to be inferior (specifically the 150 mm) in barrel and chromatic distortion. I hear the 80, 100, and 110 GS lenses are phenomenal. I use the extension rings for close portraits without a problem. In this day of digital, the 645 back seems to be the recipient of attention for digital. That might be a consideration. I have a lovely GS-1 system and it takes great pictures. The 6x7 neg is as close as you can get to the 4x5 neg. Landscapes require apochromatic lenses to preserve fine detail. I would go with a 4x5 with an APO for landscapes and the 645 for portraits, . . .
From: "Rick Rieger" [email protected] Newsgroups: rec.photo.equipment.medium-format Subject: Re: Bronica GS-1, or not? Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 I have two GS-1 bodies, five lenses, and a number other accessories. I've really enjoyed this system. It produces top quality results for me. When I was shopping around for a MF system, my requirements were for a 6x7 leaf shutter SLR with interchangeable backs suited for field work. While the Mamiya RB/RZ are great systems, the substantially larger size steered me away from them. This led me to the GS-1. Used, you can get some good deals. New, B&H Photo has a GS-1 package with 80mm lens, AE finder and back, all for approx $2,100. This is a very good deal. A good lens combination is the 50/80/150, or 65/100/200. There is a 250mm lens, but it's quite a bit larger than the 200. Another nice lens is the 110 macro, but I find I get excellent close up shots with the 100 or 200, extension tubes and the Nikon 5T and 6T close up diopters. The 1.4x extender is very good, but I don't think much of the 2x. The AE rotary finder overcomes some of the inconvenience of not having a rotating back. The GS-1 system is not nearly as large in terms of number of pieces as Mamiya or Pentax, but it has all the essentials for most people. Rick Rieger "Magne Sandnes" [email protected] wrote ... > Hi, > > I'm shopping around for a medium format system and think I'm going to buy a > Bronica SG-1. > Has anyone here used one, and want to tell me why I should/shouldn't get one? > Thanks, > Magne
From: [email protected] (Henry Posner/B&H Photo-Video, Inc.) Newsgroups: rec.photo.equipment.medium-format Subject: Re: drop GS-1 at photokina? Re: Bronica GS-1, or not? Date: 20 Sep 2002 "Magne Sandnes" [email protected] wrote... > Now I just need a polaroid back, and this is Norway; where polaroid backs > for GS-1 are slightly less common than unicorns. FWIW, in addition the the Bronica-brand Polaroid back which sells new for more than 560 USD, there's one from NPC (www.npc.com) which sells for USD 210 or thereabouts.
From: "Magne Sandnes" [email protected] Newsgroups: rec.photo.equipment.medium-format Subject: Re: drop GS-1 at photokina? Re: Bronica GS-1, or not? Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 ... The correct link is www.npcphoto.com Magne
From bronica mailing list: Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 From: "Rick Rieger" [email protected] Subject: Re: Help, my GS-1 is locked. Francois Try to move the multi-exposure lever to the multi position and see if you can wind the film advance crank. If so, you can then remove the lens as needed. Put a lens cap on the lens, or cover the lens, press the shutter release, return the multi lever to single, and wind the film. Hopefully, all will be back to normal. Rick Rieger ----- Original Message ----- From: "croizetf" [email protected] To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 Subject: [BronicaPro] Help, my GS-1 is locked. > Dear All, > > I am coming to you to get help if possible. > > My GS-1 is locked. > > During a film, the baterry when out of power. I have put a new one, > and now the GS-1 is locked. The mirror is up, I can't do anything to > win the film or to cock the lens. I can't remove the lens from the > body. I can't shoot, even with a dummy film. Evering is completely > locked... > > Is there a trick or shall I send it directly for service ? > > Any help will be greatly appreciated. > > Regards from France > > Francois
[Ed. note: for those who don't have local distributors selling copies directly...] From bronica mailing list; Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 From: David Thompson [email protected] Subject: Re: Re: GS1 Manual Hi Francesco I checked the web site and they do have a manual for the GS-1 for $10.99. You may be able to get it for free somewhere else. The address for the manual is http://www.manualsrus.com/Shopping_Cart/photo/cameras/bronica/BronicaGS1.asp Or you can go to the main page at www.manualsrus.com Have fun with your new camera, David
End of Page